fbpx

‘Big Money’ Divorce Couple Pay Enormous Price for Failing to Compromise

Big Money Divorce Couple Pay Enormous Price for Failing to Compromise

The financial fallout from divorce is frequently painful but a willingness to compromise almost always offers a better outcome for both sides. The point was made by a ‘big money’ case in which a couple instead spent more than £4.5 million in litigating their differences on a grand scale.

During their marriage, which yielded four children, the couple led an enviable lifestyle on the strength of the husband’s earnings as a highly successful builder and property developer. They lived on an impressive landed estate and owned a private yacht, each worth about £10 million. Employing a substantial number of domestic and other staff, including three gardeners and their own personal chef, the husband was able to indulge his love of sports cars, some of which cost millions.

Ruling on the financial aspects of their divorce, the High Court noted that there was a difference of more than £20 million between the wife’s and the husband’s estimates of the value of their assets. Whilst the end of the marriage had left the wife heavily in debt, she asserted that the husband’s lavish spending had continued unabated. He denied having failed to recognise the collective sacrifices they had made and argued that he was already a rich man before they married.

The Court assessed the couple’s net worth at £61,881,721 and found that the wife should receive assets valued at £19,201,912. That represented about 31 per cent of the marital pot. Her debts, which approached £2.5 million, would also be discharged so that her overall provision came to £21,693,118. The departure from the equal sharing principle was justified by, amongst other things, the wealth the husband had brought into the marriage, the risks associated with his business and the illiquid nature of his shareholdings.

The Court described the legal costs incurred in the proceedings as truly enormous. The husband had spent more than £2.3 million and the wife more than £2.2 million. They had also spent heavily on litigation concerning child contact arrangements. The Court noted that costs liabilities on such a scale suggested very strongly that judges should do all in their power to simplify financial remedy proceedings.

If you need help or advice about a matrimonial or family law matter, call us today on 0800 3 10 11 12 or get in touch online.

Our articles are provided for general interest and information only. They do not constitute legal advice. Whilst every effort is made to ensure that the content accurately reflects the law in England as at the date of its transmission, no liability is accepted for any loss or damage arising from any act or omission resulting from any information contained herein.

Latest COVID-19 Information

WE ARE STILL OPEN FOR BUSINESS HOWEVER, OUR FRONT DOORS WILL BE CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC DURING THIS 2nd LOCKDOWN PERIOD from 5th November until further notice. For us all to be as safe as possible, our preference will be to interact with clients by telephone, email and/or zoom meetings ONLY. We would ask that if you have to drop any papers off at our offices, you use our Post Box unless you need anything copying, in those cases please knock the door and one of our receptionists will deal with you at the front door but only if you are wearing protective face coverings. If you require further assistance then a member from the relevant department will telephone you thereafter to discuss. We hope you understand that this is to safeguard you, our staff and to limit as much contact as possible. We may take a little longer to respond to enquiries and deal with matters. Please bear with us. FOR MORE INFORMATION CLICK THE BUTTON BELOW.