Football Club Scores Goal in Dispute Over Sponsorship Deal Commission

Football Club Scores Goal in Dispute Over Sponsorship Deal Commission

Many agents and marketing companies earn their livings by charging a commission on the successful introduction of buyers to sellers. However, a case concerning a multi-million-pound football sponsorship contract showed that such arrangements often beg the question of whether an introduction was an effective cause of a deal being struck.

A Premier League football club engaged a marketing company to seek out sponsorship partners. The company introduced executives who worked for a gaming enterprise (the sponsor) to the club and there were various discussions concerning potential deals. More than two years passed between the introductions and the completion of a contract between the club and the sponsor.

The sponsor agreed to a three-year deal which entitled it, amongst other things, to emblazon its name on players’ shirts. On the agreement being announced, the company claimed a commission of £1,125,000 on the deal and launched proceedings after the club refused to pay.

Ruling on the dispute, the High Court found that the agreement between the club and the company was subject, either impliedly or as a matter of construction, to a term that commission would only be payable to the company if the introductions it provided were an effective cause of the deal being concluded. Such a term was required in order to achieve business efficacy.

In dismissing the company’s claim, the Court found that the driving force behind the completion of the deal was the long-term, close and trusting business relationship between the sponsor’s CEO and a marketing executive who was employed by the club shortly before the deal was done.

The deal was qualitatively different and on a grander scale than any that had been envisaged more than two years previously. Although proposals put forward by the company had been discussed, no agreement had been reached. The introductions provided by the company had nothing to do with, and were thus not an effective cause of, the deal that was eventually struck.

Our articles are provided for general interest and information only. They do not constitute legal advice. Whilst every effort is made to ensure that the content accurately reflects the law in England as at the date of its transmission, no liability is accepted for any loss or damage arising from any act or omission resulting from any information contained herein.

COVID-19 Information

We are OPEN and would like to reassure our client's that it is business as usual and as a firm we intend on supporting our clients through this difficult time. Please note: Clients are requested to wear face masks when attending our office(s). As a precautionary measure to limit the risk to everyone our preferred communication is by telephone and/or email and/or post. We may take a little longer to respond to enquiries and deal with matters. Please bear with us in these unprecedented times.